...followed by an infinitive or relative clause.
Swan's Practical (BrE)
Is it grammatical to omit the indefinite article repeated in different forms, a(n)?
...followed by an infinitive or relative clause.
Swan's Practical (BrE)
Is it grammatical to omit the indefinite article repeated in different forms, a(n)?
This is a matter of style. Here’s one (emphasis added):
5.79: Articles with coordinate nouns
In a series of coordinate nouns, an article may appear before each noun, but it is not necessary when the same type of article (definite or indefinite) applies to each noun {the rosebush and hedge need trimming}. If the things named make up a single idea, it’s especially unnecessary to repeat the article {in the highest degree of dressage, the horse and rider appear to be one entity}. And if the named things are covered by one plural noun, the definite article should not be repeated {in the first and second years of college}. But if you want to distinguish concepts or add emphasis, then do repeat the article {the time, the money, and the effort were all wasted}. For indefinite articles, you may use or omit the article before each subsequent noun {fruit salad needs an orange, a mango, and a banana} {bring a raincoat, hat, and umbrella}. In the last example, the first two items would take a while the last would take an, but only the first item need be matched with a or an {bring an umbrella, raincoat, and hat}.
Source: The Chicago Manual of Style (login required)