-1

...followed by an infinitive or relative clause.

Swan's Practical (BrE)

Is it grammatical to omit the indefinite article repeated in different forms, a(n)?

Britons seem to agree: enter image description here

17
  • Yes it's fine. Are you accusing Swan of being ungrammatical? Although in practice it's not always totally clear-cut whether to omit on grounds of clarity or style. Your link seems to require login/registration/something so maybe summarize it? Commented Mar 28 at 13:49
  • @StuartF Its just a group of Britons saying it cannot be omitted. Commented Mar 28 at 14:28
  • 1
    That link does not work. Commented Mar 28 at 15:06
  • 1
    @Lambie Omitting the second 'a' would lead to an unnatural-sounding (but not ungrammatical) sentence with your example. But with OP's example from Swan, the sentence sounds acceptable. How strictly formalism must be followed (the 'a' variant needs the distinct form to be mentioned?) is a separate issue. Commented Mar 28 at 16:56
  • 1
    You claim that Britons deny it, but it's unclear what they are disputing. It seems to me they are confirming that this usage (i.e. M.Swan's quote) is grammatical/acceptable. Commented May 22 at 8:08

1 Answer 1

3

This is a matter of style. Here’s one (emphasis added):

5.79: Articles with coordinate nouns

In a series of coordinate nouns, an article may appear before each noun, but it is not necessary when the same type of article (definite or indefinite) applies to each noun {the rosebush and hedge need trimming}. If the things named make up a single idea, it’s especially unnecessary to repeat the article {in the highest degree of dressage, the horse and rider appear to be one entity}. And if the named things are covered by one plural noun, the definite article should not be repeated {in the first and second years of college}. But if you want to distinguish concepts or add emphasis, then do repeat the article {the time, the money, and the effort were all wasted}. For indefinite articles, you may use or omit the article before each subsequent noun {fruit salad needs an orange, a mango, and a banana} {bring a raincoat, hat, and umbrella}. In the last example, the first two items would take a while the last would take an, but only the first item need be matched with a or an {bring an umbrella, raincoat, and hat}.

Source: The Chicago Manual of Style (login required)

4
  • Grammar vs logic vs stylistics, that is usually the issue. Commented Mar 28 at 17:43
  • From the preface of CMOS’s 18th edition: “This edition... balances tried-and-true editorial logic with an attention to real-world usage based on evidence that is easier than ever to find and evaluate.” Commented Mar 28 at 17:56
  • 2
    @GJC I'm not sure the a/an choice has a lot to do with grammar. It's essentially a single lexeme, with pronunciation tailored to facilitate acceptable pronunciation in a given string. Thus 'This is a (really superb) example of a trilobite fossil' is correct, though deleting the parenthetical needs a switch to 'an'. Commented Mar 28 at 19:33
  • @EdwinAshworth — Yes. Parentheses like these are seen and not heard. Though in formal writing, one would probably not insert such a parenthetical anyway. So, not much to worry about either way. Commented Mar 29 at 1:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.