Training Resource Allocation

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Vishakha Mittal
    Vishakha Mittal Vishakha Mittal is an Influencer

    Senior Manager People Development, HR @ UHG

    5,030 followers

    Decoding the True Cost of Virtual Behavioral Training: A Strategic Cost Analysis A strategic cost analysis helps in making informed investment decisions and optimizing training effectiveness. Let’s analyze the true cost of a two-day virtual behavioral training for 60 mid-level managers, facilitated by two in-house trainers, with an annual salary of ₹30 LPA each. 1. Direct Costs: Explicit Expenditure a) Trainer Cost (Internal Facilitators) Since the trainers are full-time employees, we calculate their cost per day: • Annual salary per trainer = ₹30,00,000 • Annual working days = 250 • Daily cost per trainer = ₹30,00,000 ÷ 250 = ₹12,000 • Cost for two trainers over two days = ₹12,000 × 2 × 2 = ₹48,000 Trainer Cost: ₹48,000 b) Technology & Platform Costs Assuming the organization uses an internal virtual learning platform (e.g., Microsoft Teams, Zoom, or an LMS), the marginal cost per session is low. However, factoring in licensing, tech support, and bandwidth usage for 60 participants, we estimate: Technology Cost: ₹30,000 c) Learning Materials Digital workbooks, assessments, and post-training resources could cost around ₹750 per participant: Materials Cost: ₹750 × 60 = ₹45,000 d) Administrative and Support Costs Includes training coordination, pre-session readiness, IT support, and evaluation setup: Admin & Miscellaneous: ₹40,000 2. Opportunity Cost: The Hidden Economic Impact a) Participant Salary Cost Each participant earns ₹30 LPA, so their daily salary cost is: • Daily salary per participant = ₹30,00,000 ÷ 250 = ₹12,000 • Cost for 60 managers over two days = ₹12,000 × 60 × 2 = ₹14,40,000 Participant Salary Cost: ₹14,40,000 b) Productivity Loss (Opportunity Cost) While training enhances long-term performance, it results in a temporary dip in operational output. Assuming a 25% productivity loss multiplier (lower than in-person training since managers can still manage urgent tasks), the opportunity cost is: ₹14,40,000 × 25% = ₹3,60,000 3. Total Cost of Virtual Training Trainer Cost ₹48,000 Technology & Platform ₹ 30,000 Learning Materials ₹45,000 Admin & Miscellaneous ₹40,000 Participant Salary Cost ₹14,40,000 Productivity Loss ₹3,60,000 Total Training Cost ₹19,63,000 4. Strategic Insights: Ensuring ROI on Training Investment While a virtual format reduces logistics costs, the largest cost driver remains participant salaries and lost productivity. To optimize ROI: Ensure training relevance: Align content with business objectives to maximize post-training impact. Incorporate blended learning: Spread learning over multiple short sessions to reduce productivity loss. Implement pre- and post-training interventions: Reinforce learning through coaching, peer discussions, and real-world application. Ultimately, the real return on training isn’t just cost efficiency—it’s behavioral transformation that drives business results. Would love to hear how your organization measures training ROI. Let’s discuss in the comments!

  • View profile for Amy Brann
    Amy Brann Amy Brann is an Influencer

    2025 HR Most Influential Thinker. Helping Leaders, Managers & HR to Unlock People Potential through Neuro & Behavioural Science, Author of 3 published, translated books, Keynote Speaker, Programme Designer, Consultant

    33,774 followers

    If you’re in Learning and Development… And you’re optimising for "checking the boxes" on training programs… IMO, we’re missing a trick. The likelihood of driving real behaviour change through surface-level programs is low. But when we focus on how people actually learn and grow? Game-changer. So, what should we be optimising for? ✅ Optimise for brain-friendly learning. Understand how the brain processes and retains information. Use spaced repetition, storytelling, and active engagement to make learning stick. ✅ Optimise for emotional engagement. People don’t learn well when they’re stressed or disengaged. Create safe, inspiring environments that spark curiosity and connection. ✅ Optimise for growth, not perfection. Shift the focus from “getting it right” to embracing mistakes as opportunities. Build a culture where learning is continuous, not a one-and-done event. ✅ Optimise for relevance. Every brain asks the same question: “Why does this matter to me?” Design programs that are actionable, personalised, and tied to real-world challenges. ✅ Optimise for habits, not just skills. Skills fade if they aren’t reinforced. Help people build habits that embed what they’ve learned into their daily work. AND DON’T FORGET… 🎉 Optimise for your own development. L&D professionals often pour into others but forget themselves. Stay curious. Seek out trends. Connect with peers who challenge and inspire you. CLO100 If you treat your role as a learning journey—for both yourself and your organisation—then the impact you create will be exponential.

  • View profile for Tina Paterson

    ★ Extraordinary Results in Fewer Hours ★ Hybrid Working Leadership ★ Team Performance and Productivity ★ Hybrid Teams at Outcomes Over Hours

    6,189 followers

    AI upskilling isn't just about technical training. Are you allocating budget for the leadership challenges it creates? I'm seeing a concerning trend across organisations investing heavily in AI: All focus on technical training. Almost zero attention on the leadership capabilities needed to navigate the human side of this transformation. After delivering numerous transformation initiatives throughout my career, I know this imbalance is a pattern that undermines potential success. Here's what's missing from your AI budget allocation: ❌ Your leaders aren't equipped to handle the fear and resistance that emerges when teams believe AI threatens their relevance ❌ Your executives haven't developed the skills to identify which decisions should remain human-led versus AI-augmented ❌ Your leadership pipeline isn't being prepared for the new competencies required in an AI-integrated workplace The research is clear - organizations that fail to invest in leadership development alongside technical implementation see significantly lower ROI on their investments. The organisations succeeding with AI are investing equally in: ✅ Technical capability building ✅ Leadership development focused on human-AI collaboration ✅ Change management expertise specifically for AI adoption ✅ Executive coaching to navigate complex ethical considerations What percentage of your AI transformation budget is dedicated to leadership capability building? If it's under 30%, you're likely setting yourself up for costly setbacks. Are you preparing your leaders, or just your systems? #OutcomesOverHours #AILeadership #ChangeManagement #FutureOfWork

  • View profile for Jeff Toister

    I help leaders build service cultures.

    81,802 followers

    Customer service training budgets are tight. As a training director, I got my CEO to sign off on a budget increase every year. Here's how: 1. Talk to senior leaders Ask them about their goals, strategies, and challenges. These are the priorities your budget needs to address. 2. Focus on *their* goals Create a plan that connects customer service training with improved loyalty, sales, efficiency, or whatever else your executives are focused on achieving. Senior leaders will advocate for your budget if they believe it helps them. 3. Show the $$$ Position your budget as an investment in achieving the organization's goals. Ask your CFO to validate the numbers so they're credible. Your CFO's sign-off makes your budget even more compelling to the CEO. A good budget isn't a wishlist. It's a solid plan to help the organization win.

  • View profile for Oliwia Schildt

    Business Development B2G @CareerFoundry

    3,727 followers

    Looking to upskill your employees or enhance your own skills on the job? Maybe the 'Qualifizierungschancengesetz' (long German word 🙈) is for you! The Qualifizierungschancengesetz (Skills Development Opportunities Act) is a German law aimed at promoting lifelong learning by providing financial support for employees to pursue further training.  It allows employers and employees to access subsidies for qualification programs, with funding provided by the Federal Employment Agency. The goal is to address the accelerated transformation of the working world, prevent unemployment caused by structural change, strengthen further training, and secure the skilled labor base. In a nutshell: - Up to 💯coverage of training costs. Companies can have the costs of employee training covered by public funding, up to 100%. The law enables companies to train their employees to remain competitive, but only for certified training programs. - 💰Companies are also supported through wage subsidies. Businesses with up to 50 employees can receive up to 75% of wage costs reimbursed, while those with up to 500 employees can receive up to 50%. Criteria for funding under the QCG: - Skills, knowledge, and abilities are imparted that go beyond exclusively job-related short-term adaptation training. - The acquisition of the vocational qualification for which a training period of at least two years is stipulated by federal or state law was generally at least two years ago (if applicable). - The employee has not taken part in further vocational training subsidized in the two years before submitting the application. - The program or course lasts more than 120 hours.  - The program or course, as well as the provider, must be AZAV-approved. I'll link some resources in the comments 👇 Are you already making use of the Qualifizierungschancengesetz? #upskilling #personaldevelopment #learning

  • View profile for Michelle Ockers

    Learning & Development Strategist | Empowering L&D Professionals to Drive Business Value | Delivering Practical Solutions & Tangible Outcomes | Chief Learning Strategist at Learning Uncut | Author - ‘The L&D Leader’

    12,320 followers

    How do you deliver or support effective learning when your L&D budget is tight - or doesn’t exist at all? In Learning Uncut Elevate episode 44 I’m joined by Michelle Parry-Slater for a conversation packed with practical insights for making your L&D budget stretch further. With organisations under financial pressure, many L&D teams are being asked to do more with less. Michelle flips the narrative from limitation to opportunity - highlighting how constraints can spark creative, high-impact approaches to learning that don’t rely on large budgets. She shares brilliant examples of how to prioritise spend by aligning with business goals, how to tap into cross-functional budgets, and how not-for-profits model effective low-cost strategies. From using WhatsApp groups, SharePoint, and Power BI to curating high-quality content, communities of practice, and internal podcasts - Michelle offers concrete ways to create engaging learning without hefty investments. One idea that really struck me is how shifting budget ownership away from L&D and embedding it within business functions can change how learning is valued - and help reduce the ‘order taker’ dynamic many L&D teams face. Thank you, Michelle, for joining me to share such a wealth of experience and ideas. This episode is filled with useful information for L&D professionals, listen on your favourite podcast app or go to the episode landing page to listen and access additional resources: https://lnkd.in/etwf7fK3 #LearningAndDevelopment #LearningStrategy #LearningValue #LearningTransformation #LearningUncut #Podcast

  • View profile for Kurly de Guzman, ICF PCC
    Kurly de Guzman, ICF PCC Kurly de Guzman, ICF PCC is an Influencer

    LinkedIn Top Voice | Global Career & Leadership Coach | Helping leaders and coaches bring out the best in themselves and others, to thrive in their careers | Global Career Development Facilitator

    27,725 followers

    Is your leadership training delivering results, or just a quick win? Organizations invest heavily in training programs, but the real challenge lies in turning that investment into long-term success. Having led Learning and Development for over a thousand employees and now being a Training Partner myself, I’ve seen firsthand that it’s not just about selecting a program—it’s about finding a true training *partner* who shares your goals and ensures the learning sticks. In my latest article, I break down key tips to help you maximize your training investments. These insights will help you avoid the “train-and-go” trap. Plus, I’ll share examples of how to move beyond surface-level feedback and create lasting behavioral change. Whether you're planning your 2025 programs or looking to boost current initiatives, this article gives practical advice on selecting a training partner that delivers real, sustainable results. 📌 Read the full article and take notes! #LeadershipDevelopment #LeadershipTraining #Coaching 

  • View profile for cj Ng 黄常捷 - Sales Leadership Team Coach

    I help B2B companies generate sustainable sales success | Global Membership Coordinator, IAC | Certified Shared Leadership Team Coach| PCC | CSP | Co-Creator, Sales Map | Author "Winning the B2B Sale in China"

    15,076 followers

    Why 67% of Sales Training Programs Are Failing (And How the Top 33% Win) Most sales training is broken. While companies invest millions in development programs, only one-third achieve tangible results. But here's what separates winners from the pack—and it's not what most executives think. Elite sales organizations don't just fund training; their leaders actively champion a culture of continuous learning. Companies with engaged leadership are 2.2x more likely to build thriving learning environments that change behavior. When the top management treats learning as a competitive advantage rather than a cost center, everything shifts. Forget one-off training events. Top performers have cracked the code on "learning journeys"—structured experiences that build skills progressively over time. They're 3.9x more likely to transition from onboarding directly to "everboarding," creating seamless development that gets sellers productive 4.9x faster. The best programs combine in-person training (93%), virtual instruction (66%), and self-study options (50%).  (Source: https://lnkd.in/gR2g-Fux) High-performing organizations are 2.9x more likely to embed regular mentoring and coaching, while being 5.2x more likely to equip managers with actual coaching tools and training. Without systematic coaching, even brilliant training becomes expensive entertainment. While 90% of organizations claim they measure training effectiveness, most track the wrong things. The best programs don't just measure if training happened—they measure if customers got better outcomes. Even top programs must incorporate the following elements:  - Scenario-specific content: Generic training fails where customized content according to the participants' sales scenarios succeed  - Customer outcome metrics: Every learning activity should tie directly to measurable customer value  - Behavioral change tracking: Skills taught must become behaviors sustained  - Intrinsic motivation: Connecting learning to purpose and personal growth, not just performance metrics The winners won't be those who merely keep up - they'll be the ones who redefine the game through relentless curiosity and the courage to lead customers into futures they couldn't imagine alone. The question isn't whether your organization can afford to invest in world-class sales development. It's whether you can afford not to. What's the biggest gap in your sales training approach? Let's discuss this in the comments.

  • View profile for Lucy Philip PCC

    Building leadership capacity and L&D alignment - powered by diagnostics that drive lasting behaviour change. Book a call.

    7,338 followers

    Training without follow-up coaching is like planting seeds and forgetting to water them. Companies invest thousands in training and diagnostic reports, expecting transformation. But without coaching, much of that learning fades fast. Research shows that without reinforcement, up to 75% of training is forgotten within weeks. The real magic happens when learning is applied in real work situations. Coaching helps individuals turn insights into action, overcome obstacles, and embed new behaviours. And the best part? It doesn’t have to come from external coaches. When in-house managers/leaders are enabled to coach effectively, the impact is even greater—embedding a culture of learning and driving long-term performance shifts. If you’re investing in diagnostic reports and training, don’t stop there. Coaching is what turns learning into impact—and ensures you see the ROI you expect. Are your leaders equipped to coach and follow up training investments? What’s been your experience with coaching after training? Let’s talk in the comments.

  • View profile for Chandrashekhar Bapat

    Senior Sales & Business Development Leader | Capital Equipment | Machine Tool Industry | Turnkey Solutions Expert

    10,940 followers

    "The Secret to Higher Productivity Isn’t a New CNC Machine; It’s a Trained Operator!" Here’s a hard truth I’ve learned after three decades in machining — You can buy the latest 5-axis machine, the best CAM software, or the most expensive cutting tools… But if your operator isn’t skilled enough, your ROI will never add up. Machines are only as efficient as the people who run them. Skill is the real competitive edge. In most machine shops, performance gaps rarely come from the equipment—they come from underutilized potential. An operator trained in setup optimization, tooling selection, and process understanding can outperform expensive automation in terms of consistency and uptime. I’ve seen teams who, with just the right guidance, cut setup times by 25%, extended tool life by 20%, and eliminated rework almost entirely—without changing a single machine. 💡 Training Turns Operators into Thinkers A trained operator doesn’t just press the cycle start button. They think—they notice vibration, temperature rise, tool wear, chip color, or a subtle change in sound. They know when to adjust, when to stop, and when to innovate. That awareness transforms the shop floor from reactive to proactive. ⚙️ Hidden Cost Killers: Untrained Hands Every broken tool. Every reworked part. Every missed tolerance. They’re all small leaks—but together, they sink profits. Operator training plugs those leaks by empowering people with: Process discipline Preventive maintenance know-how Real-time problem-solving skills The result? Less downtime. Less scrap. More output. 💪 The Ripple Effect of Training Training isn’t just about performance—it’s about ownership. When operators are respected as skilled professionals, morale shoots up. Loyalty improves. Attrition drops. And that directly means stability and consistency in production—two things money can’t buy. 💰 The ROI of a Skilled Operator Think of it this way — Every hour you invest in operator training pays you back in: Reduced setup and idle times Better tool utilization Fewer breakdowns Higher part accuracy Technology upgrades can be copied. Skill levels can’t. That’s your real competitive advantage. 🏁 Final Thought “A well-trained operator can make an average machine perform exceptionally". An untrained one can make even the best machine look average.” So before you plan your next capex, ask yourself — Have we fully unlocked the potential of the people running our machines? #MachiningExcellence #SkillDevelopment #CNCTraining #LeanManufacturing #ProcessEfficiency #Productivity #LeadershipInManufacturing

Explore categories