Testing Phase Protocols

𝗣𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗢𝗧/𝗜𝗖𝗦 𝗘𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀: 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗗𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗗𝗼 𝗜𝘁 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 Airports rely on complex OT/ICS systems like baggage handling, lighting, and fuel management where uptime is non-negotiable. Traditional IT pen testing methods can cause catastrophic disruptions here. The ACI EUROPE guidelines outline a risk-based, compliance-aligned framework for safe and effective penetration testing in these environments. 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀:  • 𝗢𝗧/𝗜𝗖𝗦-𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗸𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀   1. Systems like ILS, BHS, AGL, ATC, CCTV, Fuel Management, Fire Alarm Systems are critical and uptime-sensitive.  2. Even basic vulnerability scanning can cause critical errors in OT environments.    • 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗧 𝗣𝗲𝗻 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗢𝗧  1. OT prioritizes availability over confidentiality.  2. Automated tools can disrupt operations; manual or semi-automated approaches are recommended.  3. Legacy systems and clear-text protocols (e.g., Modbus) require specialized handling.    • 𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗱𝗮𝗽𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀  1. White-box or hybrid testing preferred over black-box.  2. Strict change management: Treat penetration testing as a formal change request.  3. Define halt conditions and abort criteria before testing.  4. Use sanitized, on-site devices and enforce strict cleanup protocols.    • 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗔𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁  1. Aligns with NIS2, EASA Part-IS, ISA/IEC 62443, NIST SP 800-82.  2. Emphasizes risk-based testing schedules and compliance-driven prioritization.  • 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝗰𝗼𝗽𝗲 & 𝗦𝗮𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘆  1. Avoid fully automated scans; use semi-automated/manual methods.  2. Simulate Command & Control and Impact tactics only in isolated environments.  3. Living off the land techniques require rigorous cleanup to prevent residual risk.  • 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 & 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗸 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻  1. Generic CVE scoring is insufficient; use contextual risk assessment tailored to airport operations.  2. Involve OT engineers, IT security, and vendors in prioritization.    • 𝗠𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸  • Preparation Phase: Define scope, vendor agreements, risk analysis, and communication plans.  • Execution Phase: Continuous monitoring, failover testing, and real-time incident response.  • Post-Test: Validate cleanup, review findings, and update risk models. OT SECURITY PROFESSIONALS (OTSecPro) #OTSecurity #AviationSecurity #Penetrationtest

Sterility test failure investigation (Short overview) All sterile products should be free from viable microorganisms. Sterility test is a microbiological examination to determine the presence or absence of microorganisms in a product. The filtered products are incubated with SCDM, FTM for 14 days observation under controlled temperature. If any growth/turbidity result is obtained in SCDM/FTM, investigation is scheduled. 1. Record the result and OOS generation 🔹Once the growth was observed in SCDM/FTM, record the result and inform to the Microbiology department head 🔹Generate OOS (Out of Specifications) as per respective format 🔹The result was informed to all respective departments especially QA, Production and Engineering 2. Investigation 🔹The growth media, canister, tubes were stored at refrigerator condition (2-8°C) till the complition of investigation 🔹Batch kept under hold 🔹Site investigation team started the investigation through two phases 🔹Phase I - Laboratory investigation, Phase II - Manufacturing investigation (Production) 3. Microbial Identification & DET evaluation 🔹The turbidity medium was subcultured on SCDA medium for microbial Identification 🔹Justify the organism upto species level identification 🔹Compare the isolate with In-house or Environmental isolate for data collection 🔹Perform the DET (Disinfectant Efficacy Test) for the particular isolate 🔹If DET passed in result, the product is passed. It clearly justify that the sterility test is invalid 🔹If DET failed, the product does not complies 4. Phase I - Laboratory investigation 🔹The team evaluate the testing materials, area, analyst, Controlled parameters (DP, temperature and etc), HVAC system, Sanitization method, material transfer, testing frequency, Environmental monitoring, Instrument maintenance and etc ( Overall Lab parameter) 🔹The investigation focus the possible cause through some investigation method like Ishikawa diagrams (6M analysis), 5WH1 analysis etc 🔹 Finally the investigation report submitted to QA for review and CAPA implementation 5. Phase II - Manufacturing investigation 🔹Same as phase I, the team evaluate the controlled parameters (DP, temperature etc), Batch manufacturing record, Clean room monitoring result, GMP documents, etc 🔹In phase II investigation, upto warehouse to packing all data should be evaluated 🔹Finally the report submitted to QA 6. Report approval and CAPA 🔹The investigation report are review and approved by QA 🔹If obvious error identified, QA takes action about batch production and release based on investigation report 🔹If obvious error not identified, perform the process simulation study for further batch production 🔹If the error identified in lab, retest is allowed for only one time. If the result gets growth in retest, the product is failed 🔹Based on the root cause, CAPA implementation and training provided

I've seen million-dollar robots fail because of skipped testing protocols. I know what separates success from disaster. Here's the testing framework that saved my clients from costly failures: The robotics market is growing faster than safety standards can keep up. While manufacturers rush to market, there's no universal oversight body ensuring consistent standards. Most companies self-certify compliance. The results are showing up in workplaces everywhere. I've witnessed three critical failure patterns repeatedly: Programming errors slip through without third-party testing. Mechanical failures from rushed testing. When quarterly earnings pressure meets deployment deadlines, corners get cut. Sensor reliability issues in collaborative robots. The safety margins that look good on paper don't translate to factory floors. When something goes wrong, complex supply chains make it impossible to pinpoint responsibility. Manufacturers shift liability to customers through legal agreements. But proper robotics implementation looks completely different. Here's the testing framework we developed that changed everything: Pre-deployment: Run 100 hours minimum under peak load conditions. Document every anomaly. Integration testing: Verify all safety systems with deliberate failure scenarios. If the emergency stop hasn't been tested under full speed and load, it hasn't been tested. Human factors assessment: Watch actual operators interact with the system for full shifts. The surprises always come from real-world use. That's why we built RobotLAB around owning the implementation process. Every robot we deploy goes through comprehensive testing protocols. Having local teams nationwide means we're accountable for every deployment, not just the initial sale. This approach has helped hundreds of businesses implement robotics safely. If you're considering robotics for your business... Let's ensure you do it right from day one.

🚀 Navigating the STLC (Software Testing Life Cycle) in 5G Modem Testing 🚀 As 5G technology continues to revolutionize the telecom industry, testing 5G modems has become more critical than ever. The Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC) ensures that every phase of testing is meticulously planned and executed to deliver robust and high-performance 5G modems. Let's explore each phase with real-time examples: 🔍 Requirement Analysis: Before testing begins, understanding the specific requirements is key. For example, in 5G modem testing, this might involve analyzing the need for multi-band support, carrier aggregation, or testing the modem's ability to handle high-speed data throughput under various network conditions. 📝 Test Planning: Planning is where the strategy is laid out. For instance, when testing a 5G modem, you’d plan for testing across different network conditions such as Sub-6 GHz and mmWave bands, as well as considering mobility scenarios like handovers between 4G and 5G. 🎨 Test Design: In this phase, detailed test cases are created. Imagine testing the throughput performance of a 5G modem; here, you would design tests for maximum download/upload speeds, latency under load, and power consumption across different frequency bands. 🛠 Test Environment Setup: Setting up the test environment is crucial for accurate results. For 5G modem testing, this involves setting up network simulators, configuring various 5G NR (New Radio) parameters, and ensuring the availability of testing tools like RF chambers to emulate real-world conditions. ✅ Test Execution: This is where the actual testing happens. For a 5G modem, you would execute tests to validate performance metrics such as peak data rates, low latency communication, and the modem's ability to maintain stable connections while on the move. 📊 Test Closure: Finally, document and analyze the results. In 5G modem testing, the closure phase might include detailed reports on performance under different scenarios, identification of potential issues, and recommendations for improvements or further testing. 🔗 Each phase in the STLC plays a vital role in ensuring that the 5G modem meets the high standards expected in today's fast-evolving telecom landscape. #5G #ModemTesting #STLC #SoftwareTesting #Telecom #QualityAssurance #5GTechnology