Decision-Making Models for Portfolio Managers

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Decision-making models for portfolio managers are structured approaches that help select, allocate, and monitor investments in a portfolio by balancing factors like risk, return, and market dynamics. These models use mathematical, statistical, and AI-driven techniques to guide investment decisions, making the process more systematic and less reliant on intuition.

  • Blend data sources: Use a mix of market fundamentals, technical indicators, and sentiment analysis to capture a fuller picture of market behavior when selecting assets.
  • Integrate expert perspectives: Combine your own market views with data-driven signals to create more balanced portfolios that reflect both personal insights and market trends.
  • Tailor risk management: Adjust asset selection and portfolio construction based on your risk tolerance, using models that factor in both quantitative metrics and qualitative inputs.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Sione Palu

    Machine Learning Applied Research

    37,795 followers

    The main goal of portfolio selection and construction is to create a profitable portfolio; however, this task is difficult, otherwise we would all be millionaires or billionaires. Markets are dynamic and influenced by numerous factors, while static historical data often fails to capture these dynamics. Investors seek portfolios that optimize the trade-off between risk and return, requiring robust asset allocation. Such requirement is challenging because stock returns are highly unpredictable due to the stock market's nonlinearity, noise, and chaotic nature, making asset selection difficult. To enhance portfolio selection and construction, researchers have incorporated multi-source and multi-aspect data to supplement fundamental and technical stock price data. They have also developed hybrid models involving statistics, econometrics, signal processing, and machine/deep learning (ML/DL) in recent years, which have been shown to outperform single models. DL models like LSTM and CNN excel at capturing temporal and spatial patterns in stock data, improving predictions of returns and volatility. Hybridizing CNN and LSTM (CNN-LSTM) leverages their strengths; CNN for spatial data and LSTM for time series, enabling them to handle complex market dynamics effectively. In [1] which is shared in the comments, the authors proposed a framework combining the essence of DL for stock selection through prediction and optimal portfolio formation through the mean-variance (MV) model. Their proposed framework involves a hybrid CNN-LSTM model in the first stage, which blends the benefits of the CNN and the LSTM. The framework combines feature extraction with sequential learning to analyze temporal data fluctuations. In their experiments, they used 13 input features, combining fundamental market data and technical indicators to capture the nuances of the highly volatile stock market data. The shortlisted stocks with high potential returns, identified during the selection phase, are advanced to the second stage for optimal stock allocation using the MV model. Their proposed hybrid framework is validated through comparison with four baseline strategies and relevant studies, demonstrating superior performance in terms of annual cumulative returns, Sharpe ratio, and average return-to-risk ratio, both with and without transaction costs. #QuantFinance The workflow is depicted in Fig. 3 on page 8, and its detailed description is covered on pages 7 and 8. It is straightforward to implement.

  • View profile for Mehul Mehta

    Quant Lead, USA || Quant Finance (6+ Years) || 60K+ Followers|| Charles Schwab || PwC || Derivatives Pricing || Stochastic Calculus || Risk Management || Computational Finance

    60,395 followers

    🚀 Working on New Portfolio optimization Model: Black-Litterman Model 📊 In the world of quantitative finance, traditional Mean-Variance Optimization (MVO) often struggles with practical issues like extreme allocations and high sensitivity to small changes in inputs. This is where the Black-Litterman Model comes into play! 🔹 What is the Black-Litterman Model? Developed by Fischer Black and Robert Litterman at Goldman Sachs, this model improves asset allocation by integrating investor views with market equilibrium returns. Instead of relying purely on historical data, it allows investors to blend their own insights with implied market expectations derived from the CAPM equilibrium. 🔹 Key Advantages of the Model: ✅ Stabilized Portfolio Weights – Avoids over-concentration in certain assets ✅ Incorporates Investor Views – Adjusts expected returns based on beliefs ✅ More Realistic Allocations – Reduces extreme, unintuitive positions ✅ Combines Market Information and Personal Forecasts 🔹 How It Works: 1️⃣ Start with the CAPM-implied equilibrium returns from market data. 2️⃣ Incorporate investor views using a confidence-weighted approach. 3️⃣ Use Bayesian updating to blend these inputs into adjusted return estimates. 4️⃣ Apply Mean-Variance Optimization with these refined returns to determine optimal portfolio weights. 🔹 Why Does This Matter? By addressing key limitations of traditional portfolio optimization, the Black-Litterman Model is widely used in asset management, hedge funds, and risk management. It provides a more balanced and intuitive approach to constructing portfolios, especially for institutional investors. #QuantFinance #PortfolioManagement #BlackLitterman #AssetAllocation #InvestmentStrategy #RiskManagement

  • View profile for Yash Y.

    AI Developer | Ex-ML Software Engineer | Ex-Data Science Engineer | Ex-R Instructor | AI System Design | GenAI System Architect

    1,800 followers

    AlphaAgents: Multi-Agent LLMs for Equity Portfolio Construction — and what happens when you plug in institutional sentiment + data feeds Just read AlphaAgents, a fresh paper from BlackRock researchers exploring role-based, debate-driven LLM agents for systematic stock selection and portfolio construction. The system mirrors a real investment team with three specialists that collaborate and argue their way to a decision: Fundamental Analyst, Sentiment Analyst, and Valuation Analyst. - What’s novel 1. Role specialization + debate: Agents run in a group-chat workflow (AutoGen) and must reach consensus, which helps reduce hallucinations and surfaces assumptions. 2. Risk-aware behavior: Recommendations are explicitly conditioned on investor risk tolerance (risk-seeking / neutral / averse), not just point estimates. 3. Tool-augmented analysis: - Fundamental agent uses a tailored 10-K/10-Q RAG tool; - Sentiment agent summarizes and critiques news before opining; - Valuation agent computes returns/vol and reads price/volume structure. 4. Evaluation signals: They treat back-testing as a downstream metric, in addition to task-level checks. - Why it matters This architecture is auditable, modular, and closer to how human teams actually work—diverse priors, debate, and a clear hand-off into portfolio construction. It also offers a path to mitigate cognitive biases (loss aversion, overconfidence) that creep into discretionary workflows. - Now imagine the next step Pair AlphaAgents’ workflow with institutional-grade sentiment and deep data coverage: real-time news/analyst-notes + FactSet fundamentals + PitchBook private-market context + filings + broker research. Then fine-tune or retrain reasoning models on domain-specific corpora (sentiment events, accounting footnotes, sector playbooks). The result is a futuristic portfolio management copilot that feels AGI-like in practice: - Unified data fabric (EDGAR, news, FactSet, PitchBook) → cleaned, labeled, time-aligned - Hybrid retrieval (RAG + knowledge graph) to ground every claim - Multi-agent committee (Fundamental / Sentiment / Valuation + Macro / Risk / ESG extensions) with debate + confidence scores - Risk & compliance layer (limits, exposure, scenario analysis) gating trades - Optimizer (MV, Black-Litterman, risk parity, or RL) consuming agent views - Monitoring (drift, rationale tests, counterfactuals) for production safety This is how we move from “LLM that chats” to institutional-grade, explainable, end-to-end portfolio decisioning. Paper: Attached! #AI #MultiAgent #LLM #QuantFinance #PortfolioConstruction #RAG #AutoGen #Research #FactSet #PitchBook #SentimentAnalysis #RiskManagement #AGI #AIFinance #ArtificialIntelligence #ResearchAI

Explore categories