Cross-Disciplinary Project Management Techniques

Project management isn't one-size-fits-all One approach/methodology rarely works 100% of the time. Anyone who's managed projects across different industries knows what I'm talking about. Here's why: → Construction - focused on tight regulatory requirements, strict safety protocols, and long-term planning. → Tech - Agile + adaptable processes are essential to respond to evolving client demands and quick pivots. → Marketing - managing creative resources, campaign timelines, + continuously shifting priorities. One project management approach won't fit all those needs. As a PM, your job is to adapt your approach to the unique needs of the industry/project/team. Not fit them into a pre-defined box. So if you're starting your PM journey, do: ✅ Learn a variety of PM frameworks Agile, waterfall, Lean. Each has strengths that can be leveraged to adapt. ✅ Document the unique requirements Each industry and project has different needs, collect them over time. Flexibility is more important than following a strict methodology. ✅ Tailor your communication style Each project is different, meaning it needs it's own comms plan. New stakeholders and team dynamics require custom approaches. The best PMs don't stick to one "right" way. They know when to adjust, innovate, and bend the rules. 🤙

💡 "𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐢𝐱 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐢𝐭." The same applies to #projects. When you bring people together from different functions, countries, with different roles and perceptions, the chances of misunderstandings and miscommunication are super high. Last week, I co-facilitated a 𝟐-𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐎𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐩 with my colleague and coach from Australia Neil Maxfield. The team we worked with was dealing with a highly complex situation: - Different perspectives - Misaligned priorities - Competing assumptions But guess what? We had a full toolkit for tackling complex problems, and one of the tools that stood out was the 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐇𝐢𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐲. 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐇𝐢𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐲? It’s a tool that helps distinguish between: - Past decisions (constraints and givens) - Future decisions (choices and possibilities). Instead of rushing to solutions, it encourages teams to pause, break apart what they "think they know," and organize their approach to the problem. 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐰𝐞 𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭: - Identified issues: Teams explored what wasn’t working in each problem area. - Analyzed impact: Teams prioritized high-value issues and assessed how they affected plant performance. - Clarified decisions: Team distinguished between constraints, available choices, and future decisions. - Defined success: For each problem area, we defined success measures, scope, value drivers, and overall objectives. Then, brainstorming solutions became far more effective: - Solutions were specific and directly linked to problem areas. - The team evaluated each solution against key drivers to ensure alignment with the project’s scope and boundaries. The result? Clarity, shared understanding and alignment—no matter the differences in roles or perspectives. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧? Far too often, we rush into "fixing" things without fully understanding: - What’s broken? - What’s the real impact? - What do we actually want to achieve? Tools like the Decision Hierarchy and a well-structured framing process help bring clarity and alignment before diving into solutions. 👉 What strategies do you use to align cross-functional teams? Let’s share insights in the comments! #opportunityframing #decisionhierarchy

Ask any experienced project manager about the most common challenges encountered on a project, and you'll hear a variety of answers: a growing backlog of RFIs, compressed schedules, coordination issues, and procurement delays. These are all real — and undeniably demanding. However, after more than two decades in the industry, I believe the most critical risk doesn’t lie in the schedule, budget, or construction documents. It’s misalignment. If you’ve been in the field long enough, you know the signs. 1. The architect’s intent isn’t translating into the build 2. MEP trades are working off different versions of the plans 3. The owner’s rep is assuming decisions were already made 4. The GC is waiting for submittals that were never requested 5. Your team is “busy” but progress is unclear No major blow-ups… just a slow drip of small issues that compound over weeks. And suddenly, you’re in recovery mode, not execution. As project managers, we’re the integrators. We’re the ones tasked with turning plans into outcomes. And that means getting every player on the same page — and keeping them there. 1. Define Success — Not Just Scope - It’s not enough to have a spec book and a set of drawings. What does the client define as a win? What are the non-negotiables? What risks can they tolerate? Align on outcomes before chasing outputs. 2. Establish Roles and Decision Paths - On vertical projects, there are dozens of players, superintendents, consultants, trade leads, inspectors, commissioning agents. Clarify who owns what. Who reviews? Who approves? Who coordinates field direction when conflicts arise? 3. Create a Communication Framework - Update meetings are not alignment tools they’re just status checks unless you structure them right. Set a rhythm that supports decision-making: a. Weekly cross-discipline coordination b. Owner/architect/contractor (OAC) updates c. Rolling look-ahead reviews with field leads d. Proactive document control 4. Normalize Realignment - On long-duration builds, the plan will shift through design changes, site conditions, permitting, or resourcing. Revisit expectations, clarify adjustments, and reassign responsibilities. This isn’t rework, it’s refinement. 5. Lead with Clarity - Projects follow the tone you set. If your communication is reactive, so is the team. If your expectations are vague, coordination becomes guesswork. Precision isn’t optional it’s your greatest tool. Misalignment doesn’t announce itself. It creeps in through assumption, distraction, and silence. And by the time it shows up in missed inspections or rework, you’re already behind. Be proactive. Be deliberate. Be the one who connects the dots across the entire build. Because at the end of the day, our job isn’t just to manage plans, it’s to create alignment between vision, execution, and delivery.