Stakeholder Engagement Principles

Stakeholder Engagement Map for Sustainability 🌎 Sustainability advances when companies move from speaking to stakeholders toward building solutions with them. Engagement becomes powerful when it shifts from information-sharing to participation and co-creation. Employees are not passive recipients of corporate policies. When positioned as innovators and ambassadors, they can drive cultural change that scales faster than top-down initiatives. Investors increasingly evaluate not only financial returns but also resilience and impact. Open dialogue and credible disclosures create the foundation for financing models that reward long-term value creation. Regulators and policymakers shape the boundaries of what is possible. Proactive collaboration ensures that emerging rules both protect society and enable business innovation. NGOs and civil society connect business with pressing social and environmental realities. Partnerships with them help translate global challenges into concrete, measurable corporate actions. Customers bring more than purchasing power. Through collaboration and product co-design, they accelerate the adoption of sustainable solutions and redefine what markets demand. Suppliers and partners extend responsibility beyond a single enterprise. Joint innovation in sourcing, standards, and technology transforms sustainability into a shared endeavor across the value chain. Communities ground sustainability in place. When businesses co-invest in local development, they secure trust and create ecosystems that benefit both society and the enterprise. Media and opinion leaders influence how actions are perceived. Transparent storytelling backed by evidence strengthens legitimacy and reinforces accountability. Academia and experts contribute the critical lens of science and independent validation. Engaging them ensures that strategies are rooted in knowledge, not convenience. Risk and resilience demand collective approaches. Working groups and cross-sector alliances elevate sustainability from individual commitments to systemic impact. True engagement means entering a space of shared design. It is in these interactions that sustainability moves from compliance to transformation, and from promises to outcomes. #sustainability #business #sustainable #esg

𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭: 𝐌𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐀𝐫𝐞 Enterprise Architecture abhors a vacuum—it thrives on stakeholder engagement. Often, architects jump into collaboration without first assessing one critical factor: • 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐞, 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐄𝐀? Before strategy, frameworks, or roadmaps, 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬, 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 and 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬. This will shape how you approach, gain buy-in, and drive outcomes. Here are 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐦𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐬 for aligning EA with stakeholders: 𝟏 | 𝐆𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐞 𝐄𝐀 𝐀𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐁𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 EA means different things to people, how can you align? Approach: * 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞. What do leaders think EA does? What experiences shape their view? * 𝐏𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐄𝐀 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐠𝐞. If a product saw EA as 'overhead,’ shift the conversation to ‘rapid decision-making.’ * 𝐓𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐛𝐲 𝐚𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞. Finance, operations, and IT leaders have different concerns. Meet them on their terms. 👉 𝐎𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞: When you shape EA’s role based on their reality, it becomes relevant, not theoretical. 𝟐 | 𝐀𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐄𝐀 𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 EA isn’t all architecture, it’s solving business problems. Approach: * 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐊𝐏𝐈𝐬. Growth? Efficiency? Risk? Align EA contributions to what leadership interests. * 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐭. Show architecture driving go-to-market, savings, or agility—over compliance. * 𝐀𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐞/𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐝𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐬. If EA was a bottleneck, demonstrate accelerated decision-making instead. 👉 𝐎𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞: EA is a strategic enabler, not afterthought. 𝟑 | 𝐁𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝 𝐄𝐀 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 EA works best in collaboration, not isolation. Approach: * 𝐄𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬. Decision-making improves when EA is a proactive presence. * 𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐟𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 ‘𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐄𝐀’ 𝐭𝐨 ‘𝐜𝐨-𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬.’ Stakeholders engage when architecture is a tool for their success. * 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐧𝐞-𝐨𝐟𝐟. EA isn’t a pitch—it’s a dialog evolving with business. 👉 𝐎𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞: EA shaping decisions early rather than reacting later. 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠. Before pushing frameworks or models, assess 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐄𝐀 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲—and how to reshape that narrative to unlock its full potential. How do align EA stakeholders? Let’s discuss.👇 --- ➕ 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 Kevin Donovan 🔔    👍 Like | ♻️ Repost | 💬 Comment    🚀 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬’ 𝐇𝐮𝐛 👉 https://lnkd.in/dgmQqfu2

Since its founding in 2020, Transformers Foundation has established a body of work demonstrating that suppliers have not been meaningfully included in the creation of sustainability strategies – whether they pertain to cotton, climate action, chemical management, and beyond. This is not only unjust, it's ineffective. This begs the question: if a key reason sustainability strategies fail is because the actors primarily responsible for enacting those strategies – suppliers – have not been meaningfully included in their creation, then where do sustainability strategies come from? Which stakeholder group(s) have defined the problems we seek to solve? How do solutions that reflect a particular - as opposed to shared - understanding of the problem end up so ubiquitous? These questions were the catalyst for Transformers Foundation’s latest report – which looks at supplier inclusion and exclusion in fashion’s multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) - and was authored by Elizabeth Cline. The report reveals that suppliers tend to perceive MSIs as having developed or supported strategies, standards, tools, and assessments that are enacted solely by the supply chain for the benefit of brands and retailers without their full participation or buy-in. The report’s conclusion supports and echoes Ilishio Lovejoy’s call to adapt and apply the organizational management theory of fair process to transform MSIs and enhance stakeholder engagement. Fair process is founded on three key principles:  👉Acknowledgment and reduction of bias: We call for non-biased decision-making that involves participants' perceptions of justice within a process. Organizations should acknowledge the role of bias and work to ensure that stakeholders feel they are being treated fairly in relation to others.  👉Equitable engagement and decision-making. We aren’t just calling for suppliers to have a seat at the table; they must have a meaningful voice in decision-making. We advocate equitable engagement and decision-making, which would address the power differentials and barriers suppliers face to engagement. 👉Transparency around the process -  Transparency is key to building trust and buy-in in solutions. We advocate for clear rules and reporting concerning who makes decisions, how members can and cannot influence decisions, clear communication of final decisions, and how and why decisions were reached.   The term “fair process” sounds like a tidy, technical solution, but, in my view, it's pretty radical: it's a set of rules for rule-making – and rules can never be neutral. They always have a point of view on how power is distributed. 👉Download the report and register for the launch webinar on 14 November where we'll be joined by Tricia Carey Alberto De Conti Elizabeth Cline Ilishio Lovejoy: https://lnkd.in/e2-5ayme This report was such a collective effort, but particular thanks to Marzia Lanfranchi Ani Wells Cam-Ly Nguyen.

You can’t call it partnership if stakeholders only hear from you once before launch. True engagement isn’t a courtesy email. It’s about making stakeholders 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴 from day one to follow-through. 4 shifts that make the difference: 1. Map before you move Not all stakeholders need the same level of attention. Use mapping tools to identify who has influence, what they care about, and how they prefer to engage. 2. Align objectives early Don’t wait until the end to prove impact. Bring stakeholders into planning to set KPIs, success metrics, and business outcomes together. 3. Keep communication alive Use clear, jargon-free updates. Share progress, invite feedback, and celebrate wins. Trust grows when stakeholders feel part of the journey. 4. Champion transfer, not just learning Make managers and sponsors active player, e.g. mentors, accountability partners, and reinforcement leaders. Because learning in the classroom means nothing if it doesn’t show up on the job. When engagement is tailored this way, L&D stops being a service provider… and starts being a strategic driver of business results. A question for you: What’s worked best in your experience: mapping, alignment, communication, or transfer support? _____________ High functioning ≠ high capacity. I consult with L&D teams to turn busyness into business impact.

Senior stakeholder engagement is complex—even when you’re at the top level leadership. ▶️ You’re a CXO, Director, or Business Head. ▶️You understand strategic priorities. - And yet… conversations with founders or promoters can feel misaligned. Why? Because in high-growth, lean setups, leaders operate with differing mental models: ▶️Founders focus on scale, market capture, and investor ROI ▶️You may be focused on execution feasibility, resource optimization, and team capacity This gap creates pressure. Here’s what helps navigate it with maturity and influence: ⏩ Strategic Alignment – Focus on directional clarity, not 100% agreement ⏩Expectation Management – Don’t assume shared understanding. Make it explicit. ⏩Prioritization Frameworks – Use effort-impact or short-term vs long-term matrices ⏩Stakeholder Empathy – Understand the economic pressures and growth mandates driving leadership behaviour ⏩Thought Partnership – Move from task execution to co-creating decisions ⏩Constructive Conflict – Engage in healthy tension; silence leads to drift ⏩Influence Without Authority – Use framing, timing, and context-setting as tools How have you navigated senior stakeholder engagement? What’s worked (or backfired)? Let’s open up the real conversations. #Leadership #Stakeholderengagement #Executivepresence #Organizationalalignment #Culture #CXOLeadership #Strategyexecution #Influencewithoutauthority #Managingup #Leadershipcoaching Increment-US

Why 73% of Projects Fail and How I Stopped Losing Stakeholder Support Let me tell you a quick story. Years ago, I was leading an ops overhaul that was supposed to streamline internal reporting. Everything looked good on paper, timelines, budget, resource allocation. I checked every box… Except one: I didn’t fully engage the stakeholders who would actually use the system every day. 🚨Big mistake. Within 3 weeks of launch, adoption lagged, teams worked around it, and leadership questioned the ROI. That’s when it hit me—involvement doesn’t equal alignment. Just because stakeholders are informed doesn’t mean they’re invested. So I changed my approach. Here’s what I did: • Identified key influencers across departments, not just top execs, but daily users and frontline managers. • Used long-form discovery sessions to understand their actual pain points (not just the ones listed on a dashboard). • Built a feedback loop into every sprint cycle. Small changes. Real-time validation. • Created internal linkages between project goals and departmental KPIs (this one’s huge). The result? 🎯 41% faster implementation. ✅ 3X higher adoption in the first 30 days. 💬 Consistent stakeholder engagement from kickoff to post-launch. Why does this matter for you? If you’re a project manager, ops lead, or department head, especially in finance, tech, or healthcare, here’s your reality: 📌 You’re juggling timelines, compliance, and team bandwidth. 📌 You’re expected to “drive transformation” and still “not disrupt the day-to-day.” 📌 You’re measured by results but those results start with buy-in. So ask yourself: Are you just updating stakeholders or are you empowering them to shape outcomes? That’s the difference between a delivered project and a sustained solution. If you’re tired of rework, delays, or lukewarm adoption, start by rethinking how you engage your stakeholders. Involve early. Involve meaningfully. Involve often. ✅ Start with a 30-minute alignment session before you build your next project charter. ✅ Don’t just collect feedback—co-create the solution with the people who live it. You’ll thank yourself later. Let’s stop managing projects and start leading with people who matter. #ProjectManagement #StakeholderEngagement #LeadershipInAction

Projects Don’t Fail from Poor Execution. They Fail from Poor Stakeholder Engagement. You could have the perfect plan, the best tools, and the smartest team— But if your stakeholders are not aligned, everything can derail. That’s why Stakeholder Engagement is a core domain in the PMP framework. And it’s not just about sending status emails. 🔶 What Stakeholder Engagement Really Means- 1. Identifying who your stakeholders actually are (hint: it’s not just your boss) 2. Understanding their level of influence, interest, and expectations 3. Keeping them informed, involved, and—most importantly—heard 🔶 Key PMP Concepts to Know: 1) Stakeholder Register – Your master list of people who affect or are affected by the project 2) Power/Interest Grid – Plot stakeholders to determine how much effort to invest in each 3) Engagement Assessment Matrix – Gauge how supportive each stakeholder currently is In real life, engaged stakeholders = smoother decisions, fewer surprises, and more support during challenges. In the PMP exam, expect scenario-based questions on how to handle conflicting stakeholder needs, changing expectations, and communication gaps. PS- What’s the biggest challenge you’ve faced managing stakeholders? Let’s talk below. ♻️ Repost this if you believe people management is project management.

Lessons from Qantas: Governance Must Respond to Stakeholder Expectations The Qantas board report has highlighted several actionable governance lessons that can benefit other boards facing similar challenges: 1 - Enhanced Stakeholder Engagement – Boards need to be well-informed on customer and employee metrics to preempt crises and guide better decision-making. 2 - Remuneration Reforms – Boards should align executive incentives with long-term performance to foster trust and align stakeholder interests; short term profit or share price are not enough. 3 - Stricter Oversight on Major Decisions – Involving the board in high-impact decisions—especially around reputational risks—strengthens accountability and transparency and avoids myopic analysis based on only executive perspectives. Directors are supposed to be independent for very good reasons. By proactively addressing these 3 areas, all boards can create robust frameworks that safeguard and elevate the long term best interests of our companies. We might not end up on the front page of national newspapers; but that doesn't mean we can afford to fall into bad governance habits. (Oh - and never let me do your jet engine maintenance; I can only enhance board performance, not engine performance) #BoardGovernance #StakeholderEngagement #CorporateGovernance #Leadership

Stop doing "big reveal" presentations that set you up for failure. Nobody likes surprises in business - especially not stakeholders with power. Instead, create regular working sessions where people can shape ideas together. When everyone feels ownership of the process, they'll champion the outcome. The best stakeholder relationships aren't about managing people - they're about making them partners.