Institutional Ethics Committees

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Institutional ethics committees are groups within organizations—such as hospitals, universities, or companies—that review research or business conduct to make sure it follows moral principles and legal requirements. They work to protect the rights, safety, and well-being of people involved, especially in clinical studies and corporate governance.

  • Review study plans: Before starting a clinical trial or research project, always submit your study details to an ethics committee to confirm it meets ethical and legal standards.
  • Safeguard participants: Make sure your research includes clear informed consent and special protections for vulnerable groups, so everyone understands the risks and benefits.
  • Promote transparency: Keep detailed records of all committee approvals, communications, and decisions to build trust and allow for future accountability.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Venkata Sowjanya Pokala

    Clinical Research Coordinator|worked as CRC in oncology studies | Duchenne muscular dystrophy|RAVE iMedidata, Oracle software B. Pharm Graduate at KL University

    1,071 followers

    Roles and responsibilities of an Ethics Committee in ensuring ethical conduct in clinical research? An Ethics Committee (also known as an Institutional Review Board or IRB in some countries) plays a critical role in ensuring that clinical research is conducted ethically, responsibly, and in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The primary responsibility of the Ethics Committee is to safeguard the rights, safety, and well-being of research participants. It ensures that participants provide informed consent after understanding the purpose, risks, and benefits of the study. Vulnerable populations (e.g., children, pregnant women, or individuals with cognitive impairments) receive additional protections. The Ethics Committee evaluates the study's design to ensure it is scientifically sound and ethically acceptable. They assess whether the potential benefits outweigh the risks involved. The committee ensures that the study follows ethical principles outlined in key guidelines like the Declaration of Helsinki, Belmont Report, and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The committee ensures that all foreseeable risks to participants are minimized through appropriate study protocols. They assess whether there are measures in place to address potential adverse events and ensure proper monitoring. Ethics Committees help prevent the exploitation of vulnerable individuals or groups. They ensure that participation in research is voluntary, free from coercion or undue influence, and without any unfair inducement. By reviewing and approving study protocols, the Ethics Committee promotes transparency in the research process. They require investigators to submit progress reports, adverse event reports, and any protocol amendments for review. Ethics Committees ensure that the research complies with local and international laws, ethical guidelines, and regulatory requirements. This reduces the risk of legal or regulatory issues that could arise from unethical research practices. They ensure that participant selection is fair and not biased toward or against any particular demographic or social group. Special attention is given to studies that might disproportionately burden specific populations. The committee ensures that the study design includes adequate measures to protect participants’ personal data and maintain confidentiality. The committee ensures that researchers address post-trial responsibilities, such as providing access to interventions proven effective during the study or disseminating findings transparently. Example of Ethical Failures Highlighting the Need for Ethics Committees Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972): Participants were misled and denied treatment, leading to unnecessary suffering. Nuremberg Trials: Revealed unethical human experiments during World War II, which spurred the development of modern ethical guidelines. Thalidomide Tragedy: Demonstrated the need for rigorous ethical review in drug trials.

  • View profile for Gladstone Samuel
    Gladstone Samuel Gladstone Samuel is an Influencer

    Board Member🔹Advisor🔹Consulting Partner

    17,109 followers

    𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐁𝐨𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐬 𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐫𝐫𝐨𝐫 ................ 𝘌𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘴, 𝘖𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘈𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝑩𝒂𝒄𝒌𝒈𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒂𝒔𝒆 Rajendra Lodha, a director at Lodha Developers, has stepped down while his conduct remains under review. This development has drawn attention to governance practices in India’s real estate sector. It is also a reminder of how boards, ethics committees, and independent directors play a critical role in ensuring accountability. 𝑹𝒐𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝑬𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒄𝒔 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒆𝒔 Ethics committees act as watchdogs of integrity. They investigate allegations of misconduct, ensure transparency, and protect stakeholder trust. Their role goes beyond compliance. They are tasked with upholding values that shape corporate culture. Without strong ethics oversight, organizations risk reputational and financial damage. 𝑳𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒍 𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 Under the Companies Act, 2013, directors are bound by fiduciary duties and disclosure requirements. Independent directors are required to safeguard minority shareholders, oversee related-party transactions, and ensure decisions align with the company’s ethical standards. SEBI (LODR) guidelines also strengthen the monitoring of board conduct, ensuring that corporate governance frameworks are not just symbolic. 𝑹𝒐𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝑰𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝑫𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒔 Independent directors serve as neutral voices on the board. They question management decisions, review risk exposure, and hold leadership accountable. In situations like the Lodha case, their presence becomes vital for fair and unbiased assessment. They bridge the gap between shareholders and management, reinforcing ethical decision-making. 𝑺𝒖𝒎𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝑹𝒆𝒇𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒔 Companies Act, 2013 SEBI LODR Regulation Case of Lodha Developers

  • Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) vs. Institutional Review Board (IRB) Pick up a clinical paper and you will see that some authors talk about the study getting approval from the IEC while others mention the IRB. Why so? While both aim to ensure ethical and responsible research, they focus on slightly different aspects. IEC is all about ensuring that research meets the highest ethical standards, focusing on the moral integrity of the study. They’re the ones asking, “Is this fair? Is this just?" Their goal is to protect participants' rights and ensure that clinical research is socially responsible. IRB is more like a legal watchdog that is concerned with the scientific and regulatory aspects, ensuring the study is methodologically sound, compliant with regulations, and minimizes participant risk. Think of them as the research’s compliance and legal experts. The real twist? The terminology is also geographic. IEC is commonly used in Europe, Asia, and parts of Africa, while IRB is the standard in North America, especially in the U.S. and Canada. Despite the different names, both have the same mission: to safeguard research participants and ensure studies are conducted ethically and responsibly. #ResearchEthics #Compliance #IRB #IEC #ResearchIntegrity #Science #ScientificCommunications #ClinicalAffairs #ClinicalResearch #EthicsCommittee

  • View profile for Akanksha P.

    Clinical Research Professional | eTMF & Documentation Specialist | GPAT 2023 Qualified

    3,940 followers

    🚀 Essential Clinical Trial Documents – Part 4 🔍 Ethics Committee (EC) & Regulatory Approvals – The Mandatory Green Light 🟢 Before a clinical trial can begin, Ethics Committee (EC)/IRB and Regulatory Authority approvals are non-negotiable prerequisites. These approvals are the official go-ahead signals ensuring patient safety, rights, and regulatory compliance. 📌 Why are these approvals critical? They ensure: ✅ The trial is ethically sound ✅ The rights and well-being of participants are protected ✅ The study is scientifically justified and regulatory compliant Let’s break down the essential documents required from ECs and Regulatory Authorities: ⸻ 🏛️ 1. Ethics Committee (EC) / Institutional Review Board (IRB) • Final EC/IRB Approval Letter ➤ Approval of protocol, ICF, recruitment materials, etc. • Approved Informed Consent Forms (ICF) ➤ Must include all versions and languages used at site • EC/IRB Correspondence ➤ All communication – queries, responses, approvals, etc. • Membership List of EC/IRB ➤ Validates constitution as per GCP requirements • Meeting Minutes / Review Notes ➤ Evidence of ethical review and decision-making process • Approval of Site-Specific Documents ➤ E.g., advertisements, translated forms, compensation policy ⸻ 📝 2. Regulatory Authority Approvals (Varies by country) • Clinical Trial Authorization (CTA) ➤ From national regulators (e.g., CDSCO in India, FDA in US) • Import License (if IMP is imported) • Notification of Principal Investigator (PI) to regulatory body (where applicable) • Regulatory Correspondence ➤ Includes queries, responses, clarifications, and approvals • Product Dossier / IB Approval (if required) ⸻ 🧠 Key Insight: Without EC/IRB and regulatory approvals, even a perfectly planned study is legally and ethically not allowed to begin. These documents should be present in the Trial Master File (TMF) under Zone 4 (IRB/IEC) and Zone 3 (Regulatory) as per the DIA Reference Model. 📚 Coming up next: Site Management Essentials – stay tuned! #ClinicalTrials #GCP #RegulatoryAffairs #EthicsCommittee #ClinicalResearch #TMF #ICHGCP #TrialMasterFile #ResearchEthics #IRB #CTAApproval #TMFDocuments #ClinicalOperations

Explore categories