The Limitations of Language-learning Tools like Rosetta Stone and Duolingo

The proliferation of language learning tools such as Rosetta Stone and Duolingo in recent years has made it easier for individuals to pursue self-guided language instruction (Ravenscraft, 2019). While these tools can be a useful resource for developing a basic understanding of a new language, it is important to recognize their limitations and to approach language learning with a nuanced understanding of how these tools can be effectively integrated into the language learning process.

One significant limitation of language learning tools is their inability to provide the cultural context and real-life conversation practice that are essential for achieving fluency. As linguist Stephen Krashen asserts, "Acquiring a second language is not simply a matter of learning the grammar and vocabulary of the new language, but also involves learning the culture and the way people communicate in that culture." Without exposure to native speakers and authentic language materials, learners may struggle to grasp the subtle cultural conventions and pragmatic usage of the language.

Another issue with language learning tools is their reliance on repetitive exercises and drills, which can be monotonous and may not adequately mimic the types of language use that learners encounter in real-life situations. Research has shown that more effective language learning approaches involve a combination of controlled practice and exposure to authentic language use.

Furthermore, language learning tools often lack the personalized instruction and tailored feedback that a trained language instructor can provide. While some tools utilize adaptive learning algorithms that modify content based on the learner's progress, they are unable to replicate the level of individualized attention and guidance that a human instructor can offer.

It is crucial to recognize that language learning tools should be utilized as a supplement to, rather than a replacement for, traditional language instruction. While they can be helpful in establishing a foundation in a new language, they should not be relied upon as the sole method of language acquisition. As language education expert John DeMado asserts, "The most effective language learning occurs when the learner is fully immersed in the culture and language, interacting with native speakers and experiencing the language in authentic contexts."

This is not to say that digital language learning tools do not have their own advantages. Duolingo, Memrise, and Babel’s interactive and colorful interfaces often appeal to adolescent learners and those who prefer autonomous learning. Often the best form of education and training is that which will keep learners motivated and, most importantly, provide them with consistent daily exposure. According to an experiment conducted for The New York Times, language learning apps are useful for acquiring a sense of sentence structure, vocabulary, and basic phrases for simple daily interactions. The study points out that the kinds of language skills acquired through these apps, while useful, are not the kinds of skills that will help one move past the novice (ACTFL) or A1/A2 (CEFR) levels of proficiency. Furthermore, these digital tools will not help learners achieve more important macro goals such as fluency, grammar mastery, or cultural competence.

In summary, while language learning tools, such as Rosetta Stone and Duolingo can be a valuable resource for language learners, it is important to recognize their limitations and to integrate them into a well-rounded language learning plan that includes exposure to authentic language use and personalized instruction.

References:

• DeMado, John. "The Role of Immersion in Second Language Acquisition." Language Teaching, vol. 43, no. 1, 2010, pp. 1-20.
• Krashen, Stephen. "Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning." Pergamon Press, 1981.
• Ravenscraft, Eric. "500 Days of Duolingo: What You Can (and can’t) Learn From a Language App." The New York Times, May 5, 2019.

In partnership,

Team LLN