I like this; it's pretty clear, and it covers a lot more than I thought it would.
One thing that pops out at me is the section on Reporting and Enforcement:
###Reporting and Enforcement
Reporting and Enforcement
Every person contributes to creating a kind, respectful community. If you find unacceptable behavior directed at yourself or others, you can:
- Flag the harmful content. Depending on the content, flagging will alert moderators or trigger an automatic deletion.
- Address it directly. If you’re comfortable addressing the person who instigated it, let them know how this behavior affects you or others. You can also remind them of the Code of Conduct. If the behavior escalates, disengage immediately -- staff or moderators will take action.
- Contact us. We’ll respond as quickly as we can.
I feel like this presents all three options as equally beneficial choices in a given situation, but they often aren't. For instance, if a person makes a single rude comment, you wouldn't go straight to contacting Stack Overflow; you'd either flag or maybe address it directly. Similarly, if there's a large-scale problem - say, a couple of users harassing people on a larger scale - you probably don't want to only address it yourself; letting a mod know is a good first step.
So, can there maybe be a way of making it clear that not all of these actions are appropriate for every situation? I know it's hard to succinctly do that, so maybe linking to an FAQ page or two about flag use (in addition to the one already linked) could put the options in context.